RAM Structural System Ideas

Welcome to the RAM Structural System Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Needs review
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 30, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Wall Design - too many redundant design warnings

I don't need multiple design warnings for the same condition. For example, I have an out-of-plane shear strength warning for one of my segments. I have 26 warnings (associated with 26 combinations) for the same condition. The "worst" one listed in the summary report is 0.34 kips for a wall that is 28" thick by 11' long. Please, just list the worst combination in the design warnings tab.

I don't need the warning "Minor out-of-plane shear stress less than 0.000050 ksi is ignored." I especially don't need it listed 72 times for a cut with only 3 segments and 155 combinations. The warning doesn't even tell you which segment it is referring to.

The problem with so many redundant and irrelevant warnings is useful information may get lost in the clutter.

  • Attach files