Skip to Main Content
RAM Structural System Ideas

Welcome to the RAM Structural System Ideas portal. The purpose of this site is to post ideas for enhancements and new features. We value your feedback and our team regularly reviews your suggestions for consideration in future releases.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. Vote for an existing Idea. The popularity of an Idea helps us understand its importance to our users.

  2. Comment on an existing Idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. Add a new Idea. If no existing Idea describes what you would like, add a new one!

When you Vote, Comment, or Add an idea you will also be subscribed to that Idea and will receive status updates. Please note that we may merge or rename Ideas for clarity. Thank you for your support and feedback, it is always appreciated!

Status Needs review
Created by Michael Duffield
Created on Aug 11, 2022

Absolute Member Force Envelope

In the Analysis -> Load Combinations we are able to view a member force envelope for the Max or Min, but not the absolute value for worst case loading. When looking at a braced frame elevation with brace axial loads, in order to determine the absolute worst loading we have to check both the max and min values. This absolute value should also still have it's appropriate sign convention so we know when the absolute value is a compressive or tension force.
It would be beneficial to view the absolute worst loading whether it be max compression or min tension on the same elevation. This help eliminate a step with printing an output and using Excel functions, creating duplicate reverse load combinations, etc. Having the absolute maximum force values in one brace elevation can make things more efficient for review, comparative model studies, sharing with trade partners, etc.

  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 17, 2024

    It would be useful for shear, too!

  • +6